Day25 | Freakonomics-英文有声书友会-八卦帝

Day25 | Freakonomics

英文有声书友会欧美女星 2018-05-01 00:01:22 622

创作不易，用心坚持，欢迎请BaGua喝几杯爱心咖啡！

打赏并支持本文打赏并删除本文

2018/5/1

Day25

Freakonomics

Chapter 06-2

Perfect Parenting, Part II;

or: Would a Roshanda by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet?

Just as the ECLS data answered questions about parenting that went well beyond the black-white test gap, the California names data tell a lot of stories in addition to the one about distinctively black names. Broadly speaking, the data tell us how parents see themselves—and, more significantly, what kind of expectations they have for their children.

Here’s a question to begin with: where does a name come from, anyway? Not, that is, the actual source of the name—that much is usually obvious: there’s the Bible, there’s the huge cluster of traditional English and Germanic and Italian and French names, there are princess names and hippie names, nostalgic names and place names. Increasingly, there are brand names (Lexus, Armani, Bacardi, Timberland) and what might be called aspirational names. The California data show eight Harvards born during the 1990s (all of them black), fifteen Yales (all white), and eighteen Princetons (all black). There were no Doctors but three Lawyers (all black), nine Judges (eight of them white), three Senators (all white), and two Presidents (both black). Then there are the invented names. Roland G. Fryer Jr., while discussing his names research on a radio show, took a call from a black woman who was upset with the name just given to her baby niece. It was pronounced shuh-TEED but was in fact spelled “Shithead.”

Shithead has yet to catch on among the masses, but other names do. How does a name migrate through the population, and why? Is it purely a matter of zeitgeist, or is there some sensible explanation? We all know that names rise and fall and rise— witness the return of Sophie and Max from near extinction—but is there a discernible pattern to these movements?

The answer lies in the California data, and the answer is yes.

Among the most interesting revelations in the data is the correlation between a baby’s name and the parents’socioeconomic status. Consider the most common female names found in middle-income white households versus low-income white households. (These and other lists to follow include data from the 1990s alone, to ensure a large sample that is also current.)

Most Common Middle-Income White Girl Names

1.Sarah

2.Emily

3.Jessica

4.Lauren

5.Ashley

6.Amanda

7.Megan

8.Samantha

9.Hannah

10.Rachel

11.Nicole

12.Taylor

13.Elizabeth

14.Katherine

15.Madison

16.Jennifer

17.Alexandra

18.Brittany

19.Danielle

20.Rebecca

Most Common Low-Income White Girl Names

1.Ashley

2.Jessica

3.Amanda

4.Samantha

5.Brittany

6.Sarah

7.Kayla

8.Amber

9.Megan

10.Taylor

11.Emily

12.Nicole

13.Elizabeth

14.Heather

15.Alyssa

16.Stephanie

17.Jennifer

18.Hannah

19.Courtney

20.Rebecca

There is considerable overlap, to be sure. But keep in mind that these are the most common names of all, and consider the size of the data set. The difference between consecutive positions on these lists may represent several hundred or even several thousand children. So if Brittany is number five on the low-income list and number eighteen on the middle-income list, you can be assured that Brittany is a decidedly low-end name. Other examples are even more pronounced. Five names in each category don’t appear at all in the other category’s top twenty. Here are the top five names among high-end and low-end families, in order of their relative disparity with the other category:

Most Common High-End White Girl Names

1.Alexandra

2.Lauren

3.Katherine

4.Madison

5.Rachel

Most Common Low-End White Girl Names

1.Amber

2.Heather

3.Kayla

4.Stephanie

5.Alyssa

And for the boys:

Most Common High-End White Boy Names

1.Benjamin

2.Samuel

3.Jonathan

4.Alexander

5.Andrew

Most Common Low-End White Boy Names

1.Cody

2.Brandon

3.Anthony

4.Justin

5.Robert

Considering the relationship between income and names, and given the fact that income and education are strongly correlated, it is not surprising to find a similarly strong link between the parents’level of education and the name they give their baby. Once again drawing from the pool of most common names among white children, here are the top picks of highly educated parents versus those with the least education:

Most Common White Girl Names Among High-Education Parents

1.Katherine

2.Emma

3.Alexandra

4.Julia

5.Rachel

Most Common White Girl Names Among Low-Education Parents

1.Kayla

2.Amber

3.Heather

4.Brittany

5.Brianna

Most Common White Boy Names Among High-Education Parents

1.Benjamin

2.Samuel

3.Alexander

4.John

5.William

Most Common White Boy Names Among Low-Education Parents

1.Cody

2.Travis

3.Brandon

4.Justin

5.Tyler

The effect is even more pronounced when the sample is widened beyond the most common names. Drawing from the entire California database, here are the names that signify the most poorly educated white parents.

The Twenty White Girl Names That Best Signify Low-Education Parents

(Average number of years of mother’s education in parentheses)

1. Angel (11.38)

2. Heaven (11.46)

3. Misty (11.61)

4. Destiny (11.66)

5. Brenda (11.71)

6. Tabatha (11.81)

7. Bobbie (11.87)

8. Brandy (11.89)

9. Destinee (11.91)

10. Cindy (11.92)

11.Jazmine (11.94)

12.Shyanne (11.96)

13.Britany (12.05)

14.Mercedes (12.06)

15.Tiffanie (12.08)

16. Ashly (12.11)

17. Tonya (12.13)

18.Crystal (12.15)

19.Brandie (12.16)

20. Brandi (12.17)

If you or someone you love is named Cindy or Brenda and is over, say, forty, and feels that those names did not formerly connote a low-education family, you are right. These names, like many others, have shifted hard and fast of late. Some of the other low-education names are obviously misspellings, whether intentional or not, of more standard names. In most cases the standard spellings of the names—Tabitha, Cheyenne, Tiffany, Brittany, and Jasmine—also signify low education. But the various spellings of even one name can reveal a strong disparity:

Ten “Jasmines” in Ascending Order of Maternal Education

(Years of mother’s education in parentheses)

1.Jazmine (11.94)

2.Jazmyne (12.08)

3.Jazzmin (12.14)

4.Jazzmine (12.16)

5.Jasmyne (12.18)

6.Jasmina (12.50)

7. Jazmyn (12.77)

8. Jasmine (12.88)

9. Jasmin (13.12)

10. Jasmyn (13.23)

Here is the list of low-education white boy names. It includes the occasional misspelling (Micheal and Tylor), but more common is the nickname-as-proper-name trend.

The Twenty White Boy Names That Best Signify Low-Education Parents

(Years of mother’s education in parentheses)

1. Ricky (11.55)

2. Joey (11.65)

3. Jessie (11.66)

4. Jimmy (11.66)

5. Billy (11.69)

6. Bobby (11.74)

7. Johnny (11.75)

8. Larry (11.80)

9. Edgar (11.81)

10. Steve (11.84)

11. Tommy (11.89)

12. Tony (11.96)

13. Micheal (11.98)

14. Ronnie (12.03)

15. Randy (12.07)

16. Jerry (12.08)

17. Tylor (12.14)

18. Terry (12.15)

19. Danny (12.17)

20. Harley (12.22)

Now for the names that signify the highest level of parental education. These names don’t have much in common, phonetically or aesthetically, with the low-education names. The girls’names are in most regards diverse, though with a fair share of literary and otherwise artful touches. A caution to prospective parents who are shopping for a “smart” name: remember that such a name won’t make your child smart; it will, however, give her the same name as other smart kids—at least for a while. (For a much longer and more varied list of girls’and boys’names)

The Twenty White Girl Names That Best Signify High-Education Parents

(Years of mother’s education in parentheses)

1.Lucienne (16.60)

2.Marie-Claire (16.50)

3.Glynnis (16.40)

4. Adair (16.36)

5. Meira (16.27)

6.Beatrix (16.26)

7.Clementine (16.23)

8.Philippa (16.21)

9. Aviva (16.18)

10. Flannery (16.10)

11. Rotem (16.08)

12. Oona (16.00)

13. Atara (16.00)

14. Linden (15.94)

15. Waverly (15.93)

16. Zofia (15.88)

17.Pascale (15.82)

18.Eleanora (15.80)

19. Elika (15.80)

20. Neeka (15.77)

Now for the boys’names that are turning up these days in high-education households. This list is particularly heavy on the Hebrew, with a noticeable trend toward Irish traditionalism.

The Twenty White Boy Names That Best Signify High-Education Parents

(Years of mother’s education in parentheses)

1. Dov (16.50)

2. Akiva (16.42)

3. Sander (16.29)

4. Yannick (16.20)

5. Sacha (16.18)

6. Guillaume (16.17)

7. Elon (16.16)

8. Ansel (16.14)

9. Yonah (16.14)

10. Tor (16.13)

11.Finnegan (16.13)

12.MacGregor (16.10)

13.Florian (15.94)

14. Zev (15.92)

15. Beckett (15.91)

16. Kia (15.90)

17. Ashkon (15.84)

18. Harper (15.83)

19. Sumner (15.77)

20. Calder (15.75)

If many names on the above lists were unfamiliar to you, don’t feel bad. Even boys’names—which have always been scarcer than girls’—have been proliferating wildly. This means that even the most popular names today are less popular than they used to be. Consider the ten most popular names given to black baby boys in California in 1990 and then in 2000. The top ten in 1990 includes 3,375 babies (18.7 percent of those born that year), while the top ten in 2000 includes only 2,115 (14.6 percent of those born that year).

Most Popular White Girl Names

1980

1.Jennifer

2.Sarah

3.Melissa

4.Jessica

5.Christina

6.Amanda

7.Nicole

8.Michelle

9.Heather

10.Amber

2000

1.Emily

2.Hannah

3.Madison

4.Sarah

5.Samantha

6.Lauren

7.Ashley

8.Emma

9.Taylor

10.Megan

A single holdover: Sarah. So where do these Emilys and Emmas and Laurens all come from? Where on earth did Madison come from?* It’s easy enough to see that new names become very popular very fast—but why?

Let’s take another look at a pair of earlier lists. Here are the most popular names given to baby girls in the 1990s among low-income families and among families of middle income or higher.

Most Common “High-End” White Girl Names in the 1990s

1.Alexandra

2.Lauren

3.Katherine

4.Madison

5.Rachel

Most Common “Low-End” White Girl Names in the 1990s

1.Amber

2.Heather

3.Kayla

4.Stephanie

5.Alyssa

Notice anything? You might want to compare these names with the “Most Popular White Girl Names” list, which includes the top ten overall names from 1980 and 2000. Lauren and Madison, two of the most popular “high-end” names from the 1990s, made the 2000 top ten list. Amber and Heather, meanwhile, two of the overall most popular names from 1980, are now among the “low-end” names.

There is a clear pattern at play: once a name catches on among high-income, highly educated parents, it starts working its way down the socioeconomic ladder. Amber and Heather started out as high-end names, as did Stephanie and Brittany. For every high-end baby named Stephanie or Brittany, another five lower-income girls received those names within ten years.

So where do lower-end families go name-shopping? Many people assume that naming trends are driven by celebrities. But celebrities actually have a weak effect on baby names. As of 2000, the pop star Madonna had sold 130 million records worldwide but hadn’t generated even the ten copy cat namings—in California, no less—required to make the master index of four thousand names from which the sprawling list of girls’names was drawn. Or considering all the Brittanys, Britneys, Brittanis, Brittanies, Brittneys, and Brittnis you encounter these days, you might think of Britney Spears. But she is in fact a symptom, not a cause, of the Brittany/Britney/Brittani/Brittanie/Brittney/Brittni explosion. With the most common spelling of the name, Brittany, at number eighteen among high-end families and number five among low-end families, it is surely approaching its pull date. Decades earlier, Shirley Temple was similarlya symptom of the Shirley boom, though she is often now remembered as its cause. (It should also be noted that many girls’names, including Shirley, Carol, Leslie, Hilary, Renee, Stacy, and Tracy began life as boys’ names, but girls’names almost never cross over to boys.)

So it isn’t famous people who drive the name game. It is the family just a few blocks over, the one with the bigger house and newer car. The kind of families that were the first to call their daughters Amber or Heather and are now calling them Lauren or Madison. The kind of families that used to name their sons Justin or Brandon and are now calling them Alexander or Benjamin. Parents are reluctant to poach a name from someone too near—family members or close friends—but many parents, whether they realize it or not, like the sound of names that sound “successful.”

But as a high-end name is adopted en masse, high-end parents begin to abandon it. Eventually, it is considered so common that even lower-end parents may not want it, whereby it falls out of the rotation entirely. The lower-end parents, meanwhile, go looking for the next name that the upper-end parents have broken in.

So the implication is clear: the parents of all those Alexandras, Laurens, Katherines, Madisons, and Rachels should not expect the cachet to last much longer. Those names are already on their way to overexposure. Where, then, will the new high-end names come from?

It wouldn’t be surprising to find them among the “smartest” girls’and boy s’names in California, listed on pages 181-82, that are still fairly obscure. Granted, some of them—Oona and Glynnis, Florian and Kia—are bound to remain obscure. The same could be surmised of most of the Hebrew names (Rotem and Zofia, Akiva and Zev), even though many of today’s most mainstream names (David, Jonathan, Samuel, Benjamin, Rachel, Hannah, Sarah, Rebecca) are of course Hebrew biblical names. Aviva may be the one modern Hebrew name that is ready to break out: it’s easy to pronounce, pretty, peppy, and suitably flexible.

Drawn from a pair of “smart” databases, here is a sampling of today’s high-end names. Some of them, as unlikely as it seems, are bound to become tomorrow’s mainstream names. Before you scoff, ask yourself this: do any of them seem more ridiculous than “Madison” might have seemed ten years ago?